Defence and the bench: the cause of dwindling Football scoresMay 10 2019
When fans assemble to watch their favourite footy teams battle, they hope for a heart-stopping, high scoring affair that keeps them on the edge of their seat and on the brink of spilling their beer. This has failed to be the case on more and more occasions in recent times with statistics showing decreased average scoring in many football codes.
University of South Australia, Masters student, Jackson Lane has completed a study look at past game results in the AFL, aligning these with an array of game specific statistics, including offensive and defensive play-related variables, to uncover connections between playing style and other factors that impact scoring.
The 2019 season saw the introduction of nine new rule and interpretation changes designed to keep games flowing and the scores high.
However, scores have been notably lower than previous seasons during the early rounds, highlighted by an encounter between the Fremantle Dockers and the Adelaide Crows in round seven, where the Crows scored just three behinds while the Dockers failed to score in the second quarter - the lowest combined quarter score since 1996.
The research revealed a decrease in offensive style while there was a strong increase in defensive style including stoppages, interchange rotations and changes in coaching tactics.
Other studies show that explosive energy is replenished to a higher quality with light active recovery, an opportunity more often available when players are given longer rest through stoppages in play or regular rotations off the field.
Lane believes this allow players to play at a higher defensive level for longer periods of the match.
“More frequent periods of recovery during a match generally means a longer time before fatigue will impact their performance,” Lane says.
“Added stoppage breaks allow them to play more defensively, rather than zoning-off which is a common characteristic of players experiencing fatigue.”
In 2006-07 when offensive style trended at its highest, figures showed around 50 rotations per team per match. Over time, the interchange rate considerably increased to as high as 140 rotations per match in 2013, correlating with the decreased scoring.
Despite a new 90 rotation cap placed on teams by the AFL in 2016, scoring totals have not increased sparking further questions about how we can increase scoring.
The 2007 average score was 95 points per game (PPG), per team, an average that was significantly higher than the current average score for 2019 after seven rounds, which sits at 81 PPG, a 14.7 per cent score decrease.
“Our results show that continuing to drop the interchange rate to no higher than 50 per match should significantly increase scoring,” Lane says.
“There are other possible solutions including the introduction of a ‘decongestion’ layout, bonus points for long-range scoring or scoring over 100 points, or even something as extreme as decreasing the number of players on the field.”
While the potential changes seem controversial and players and fans may be hesitant to accept more changes, the study shows each of these factors currently have negative impacts on average scoring, removing the overall enjoyment of the matches from a spectator perspective.
Fans were quick to slam the Crows and Dockers for their low scoring game on social media, referring to the match as ‘snoozeville’ and even comparing the infrequent scoring to soccer where on average, less than three goals are scored per match at the elite level.
The study highlights the most successful AFL teams in recent times have had the perfect balance of offensive and defensive style during times where defensive play is at its most prominent.
The research shows offensive tactic sets apart a premiership team from a ‘wooden spooner’.
“It sounds straightforward, but we found premiership winning clubs have a stronger presence of offensive style, whereas the amounts of defensive style are uniform across all teams.”
Media: Michele Nardelli: office +61 8 8302 0966| mobile: +61 418 823 673 email: email@example.com
Lead Researchers: Jackson Lane | mobile: +61 411 595 762
RT @RogerEston: Great to be at the first birthday celebration at UniSA’s Pridham Hall. Amazing facility and great staff! Congratulations Br…
UK - Europe Alumni
Education at UniSA: Choose to Study with the Best
Career Adviser Information Session
The Good University: What Universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change
Study Social Work or Ageing and Disability Services at UniSA
17th International Conference on Communication, Medicine, and Ethics (COMET)
Areas of study and research
- Health Research
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA)
- Centre for Cancer Biology
- Centre for Drug Discovery and Development
- Centre for Population Health Research
- Centre of Research Excellence for the Prevention of Chronic Conditions in Rural and Remote High Risk Populations
- International Centre for Allied Health Evidence
- Medicine and Device Surveillance CRE
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre
and Social Sciences
- Art, Architecture and Design
- Communication, International Studies and Languages
- Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy
- Hawke Research Institute
- Asia Pacific Centre for Work Health and Safety
- Australian Centre for Child Protection
- Barbara Hardy Institute
- Centre for Research in Education
- Hawke EU Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence
- Centre for Islamic Thought and Education
- International Centre for Muslim and non-Muslim Understanding
- Research Centre for Languages and Cultures
- Zero Waste SA Research Centre for Sustainable Design and Behaviour (sd+b)
IT, Engineering and
- Future Industries Institute
- UniSA College